TOOL OF THE DAY: Judicial Notice

CATEGORY: Family Law Definition

Judicial notice is a term used to enter evidence in bulk and to save time. It is not the same thing as entering your exhibits in bulk during trial, since you still have to use your exhibits to prove something in your case. When you take judicial notice you are getting the court to agree that what they are accepting on the record is already proven to be factual and true.

Although taking judicial notice of your entire file can be used to save time, it can also be used in a way that might disadvantage you so be very careful. In fact, you could disadvantage yourself if you ask a judge to take judicial notice of your entire file and didn’t pay attention to every detail in that file. If there is anything in there that you might have wanted to argue still, then don’t ask for the entire file to be accepted that way.

It is worth it to take the time to itemize the things is well-known and an indisputable fact; make a list and present that as the things you want the court to take judicial notice on. An example of things that would be indisputable and well-known would be things like a person’s date of birth, basic mathematical facts**, a surgery someone might have had that has already been proven in another hearing, a motion or pleading that no one objected to with affidavits, a day of the week that corresponds to a date on the calendar, etc. that you want to get into the record without having to go through entering them formally, etc.

Once you do this properly, this can actually be a very effective tool. If the other side has not done their homework you actually might be able to get something on the record that they didn’t object to and now you can use it as factual and move on to the next exhibit to nail that issue home and prevail on what you were trying to prove in order to get what you want out of the court.

You might also try getting the court to take judicial notice of your parental rights as stated in the case law that you are using to support your case.

“In the United States, Article II of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”) addresses judicial notice in federal courts, and this article is widely copied by U.S. States. FRE 201(b)) permit judges to take judicial notice of two categories of facts:

  1. Those that are “generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court” (e.g. locations of streets within the court’s jurisdiction) or
  2. Those that are “capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned” (e.g. the day of the week on a certain date).[3]

The FRE also notes that judicial notice may be permissive or mandatory. If it is permissive, then the court may choose to take judicial notice of the fact proffered, or may reject the request and require the party to introduce evidence in support of the point. If it is mandatory, then the court must take judicial notice of the fact proffered. Although the FRE does not expand upon the kinds of facts that would fall into one category or another, courts have ruled that judicial notice must be taken of federal public laws and treaties, state public laws, and official regulations of both federal and local government agencies.“* (emphasis added)

Take Care and see you back here tomorrow!


Read our book for citations of specific cases that you can use in your arguments to the court when you are arguing for the proper protection of your family rights.

[CLICK HERE to get the Parental Rights book “NOT in The Child’s Best Interest.]

You can learn more about this and how to reason through your rights and protect your rights in our books and courses. Click at the top on Store and you will find the books and training tabs. The book teaches you your rights and the training courses teach you how to argue them like I demonstrated above.]

Be sure to subscribe to our website and receive notices when the new Daily Tool is posted each day. Subscribe here: SUBSCRIBE
NEW Family Rights Wiki pages with more tools and information here:


Strategic Parental Rights Strategist, Instructor, Constitutional Scholar, and Author

Divorce Solutions and Child Custody Solutions

Co-author “Not in the Child’s Best Interest” (Book on parental rights and children’s rights)

Co-author “Protecting Parent-Child Bonds: 28th Amendment” (Book includes guide for legislators)


Twitter: (@fixfamilycourts)




Disclaimer: I am NOT an attorney or a lawyer. I do NOT practice law in any federal or State court system. Any information provided by me to you, regardless of how specific, is NOT intended to be legal advice under any state or federal law. I provide research, written strategies, and non-professional personal opinions on the Constitution and State laws as free exchange of politically important information that also serves an important public need and interest allowed under the First Amendment. You are highly encouraged to engage an attorney in your State to help you with the specifics of your legal issues and the law in your State. If you are a pro se litigant then you bear all and full responsibility for understanding the law in your state and acting under the law in your state. Nothing you receive from me is intended to be a “legal” document for purposes of any type of filing in any court. You are free to use my words for your personal non-commercial benefit, or as an aide in petitioning your government for redress of perceived wrongs, if properly cited where appropriate. YOU TAKE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY LEGAL ACTIONS YOU PURSUE AND THE RESULTS THAT YOU GET. I BEAR NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR RESULTS. MY OPINIONS ARE NOTHING MORE THAN MY PERSONAL NON-PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS OR BELIEFS. I MAKE NO CLAIMS OF LEGAL COMPETENCY IN THE LAW UNDER ANY GOVERNMENT STANDARD OF COMPETENCY IN THE LAW.


The information provided above is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. You should consult an attorney regarding your rights under the law.

– See more at:

  • See more at: