Divorce Courts are Government by Men NOT Government by Laws

by | Jun 2, 2013

Last modified June 2, 2013

The Supreme Court back in 1886 dealt with a city code that placed the determination of a violation in the hands of the enforcer. This is the same thing that Divorce Custody Statutes do. They place complete discretion in the hands of one person alone. This is what the Supreme Court had to say about […]

The Supreme Court back in 1886 dealt with a city code that placed the determination of a violation in the hands of the enforcer. This is the same thing that Divorce Custody Statutes do. They place complete discretion in the hands of one person alone. This is what the Supreme Court had to say about this concept.

“…the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.” Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356 – Supreme Court 1886

The best interests of the child is NOT a legal standard. It is nothing more than a fancy way of saying the “whim of a single judge” and the denial of any effective means of appeal over that judge’s whim. This is NOT acceptable in a country that prides itself on abiding by the rule of law.

Ron B Palmer Small Bio image

Written by RonBPalmer

Ron has a 25 year history solving complex governance and process problems for the largest companies in the world as a consultant working for some of the largest consulting companies in the world. He has a background in economics, complex systems design, and business operations management. Decades of high level industry consulting skills have been focused on family law for over a decade and Ron has identified the key flaws and devised solutions that you can apply today to help you keep your rights over your child and help ensure that your child never faces the same corrupt system.